The Bible talks about God’s being everywhere present. So He’s infinite. “Beyond infinite” is a category error. God could be a tiny speck, but He would also, at the same time, be infinitely large. He can be present everywhere while also being present in one place in a different way than He is in another place. So He could localize some manifestation of Himself (like when He appeared to Moses on Mount Sinai) while also being present on the Moon or Eta Carinae. But He was not visibly displaying Himself (that we know of) on the Moon while He was visibly displaying Himself on a mountain in the Sinai Peninsula.

Is that making sense? We can talk about God being infinitely small while simultaneously being infinitely large. He is all infinities.

I’ve got to come back to the concept that infinity means what has gone beyond measurement. Infinity is a finite person’s construct to delineate things which are actually, finally, unknowable in a complete sense to a finite person. It is possible for a finite person to know everything in the entire universe, since the universe is finite. But it is not possible for a finite person to know the highest number (you could always add one) so we call number infinite. It goes beyond finite abilities to know in any complete sense. God is also infinite. He is beyond finite abilities to know in any complete sense. So when we call God infinite and number infinite, we’re not saying they have anything like equal existence. We’re saying that they are equally impossible for finite beings to fully know. Which is a weak concept for describing the limitless, but it’s the best finite beings can do. In a very real sense, God is more limitless than number, but words begin to fall apart when we try to describe how. We’ve made the mistake of trying to measure what has gone beyond measurement. We end up moving into the realm of poetry to describe impressions of limitlessness or of our intense smallness in the face of limitlessness. Our finite ideas just aren’t strong enough to move those concepts around.